Can we ship? Get an answer you can defend.
Release decisions should not depend on scattered dashboards, spreadsheets and Slack threads. AxonQA connects manual testing, automation, API checks, coverage and bugs in one project, evaluates the evidence against your quality bar, and gives your team a clear answer on whether to ship.
The release decision
One release. Three honest answers.
AxonQA checks the evidence against the quality bar your team set. The result is not a decorative health score; it is a decision people can inspect, challenge and trust.
Ready
Everything that must hold, holds.
The evidence meets the release bar you agreed before the decision.
Ready, with acceptances
The exception is visible and owned.
The risk, reason, owner and time are preserved with the decision.
Not ready
A required condition failed.
The blocker is named, linked to its evidence and impossible to wave away.
Watch the decision take shape
Evidence comes together, the agreed bar is checked, exceptions are named and the verdict is recorded.
A four step release readiness walkthrough. AxonQA gathers manual, automation, API and bug evidence, checks the agreed release bar, records accepted risks and freezes the final verdict.
Release 4.2
StagingLive assessmentThe walkthrough begins when it enters view
The quality bar, evidence, accepted risks, actor and time are frozen with every assessment.
Everything behind the answer
One project. The whole quality picture.
Manual and automated runs, story coverage, API checks, bugs and recent changes stay connected. The Overview page shows where the project stands and exactly what needs attention next.
12 Aug
Tests9
Passed8
Failed1
Complete checkout with valid information timed out. Not repaired, raised as STORE-141.
How AxonQA works
From scattered QA work to a decision you can defend
Five steps that end in an answer rather than a report.
- 1Bring in your QA workStart from a Jira or Azure DevOps ticket, an existing test case import, a flow you record, or let Axon explore the app and draft cases from what it finds. Any one of these works on its own.
- 2Connect it upRequirements, test cases, automation, API checks and bugs become one linked set, so coverage is something you can see rather than something you estimate.
- 3Run the planExecute manual phases and automation together, across browsers, with video, screenshots and logs kept against every run. Alerts reach Slack, Teams or email the moment something fails.
- 4See where the risk isFailures, open bugs by severity, unfinished phases and coverage gaps are gathered in one place, so the problems surface instead of waiting to be noticed.
- 5Get the release verdictAxon checks all of it against the conditions you set and answers the only question that matters. Ready to ship, ready with the things you are knowingly accepting, or not ready. The report is frozen, so the decision still stands up a month later.
The platform
Four kinds of testing, one source of truth
Not four tools bolted together. Creation, automation, API testing and insight share the same project, the same requirements and the same coverage number. That shared ground is what makes a release verdict possible at all, because a verdict drawn from one tool's data is only ever a partial answer.
App exploration
Point Axon at your app. Watch it map itself.
Give Axon a URL and it explores publicly reachable applications in AxonQA Cloud. Choose the local AxonQA Agent when the target is private or firewalled. Axon maps the pages, elements, forms and journeys it can reach before turning them into grounded manual and automated tests, and reports what it could not reach so the gaps stay visible. Exploration is optional: you can also import from Jira, bring a TestRail export, or write cases by hand.
Journeys found
2Click any page in the map to see exactly what Axon captured.
Two ways to run it
Guided exploratory
You click through your app like a real user, and Axon learns it as you go. It records the journeys you walk and builds new ones from the pages you explore, capturing elements, locators, and screenshots along the way.
Autonomous exploration
Axon navigates for you, following links, filling forms, and collecting the same evidence automatically. Choose Quick, Smart, or Deep, then customize limits when you need to.
Captured on each reached page
Then describe a test
One sentence in. One grounded test out.
Describe any check in plain language and Axon builds exactly that test from what it captured: real pages, real controls, locators as they exist in your markup. Run it once to watch it pass, then save it to a project. And if Axon has not captured enough to build it, it says so instead of guessing.
See how it worksYou describe it
“A user can add an item to the cart and see the total update”
Build itGenerated test
Add an item to the cart
- 1
Open the products page
found in your app - 2
Click “Add to cart” on the first product
found in your app[data-test="add-to-cart"] - 3
Verify the cart badge shows 1 item
found in your app
Self-healing
Tests break when the app moves. The repair should not be a lie.
When a selector breaks, Axon replaces it while the suite is still running and re-runs the fix to prove it passes. No queue waiting for you in the morning.
The part worth knowing is what it will not do. A repair can change how a test finds something, never what it expects to see, so a check on a £50 total can never be quietly healed into a check on £40. When the page is fine and the expectation is not, that is what a bug looks like: the test stays red and you are told why. And a test it could not honestly repair is quarantined, which is one of the conditions your release is judged against.
Proposed repair, rejected
Was checking
Total: £50.00
Would have become
Total: £40.00
Blocked.
Changing the expected value would mask a potential bug. The test stays red and the failure is reported as a probable defect.
Illustrative figures. The guard is real, applied to every proposed change, and covered by regression tests.
Axon AI, throughout your QA workspace
Most QA assistants stop at the test. Axon does not.
Ask for an outcome in plain English and Axon explores your app, drafts tests from what it finds, runs them, repairs the ones that broke because the interface moved while the suite is still running, files a bug for the ones that did not, and tells you where the release stands. It turns the request into visible work and reports back in the same conversation.
It also stops in the right place. Axon reads the readiness assessment, but it cannot change the conditions a release is judged against and it cannot accept a risk for you. That decision keeps a person’s name on it.
That reach is concrete: 200+ actions across AxonQA, with the context of your workspace, projects, requirements, tests and recent runs. Cloud automation runs and conditional run chains can continue after you leave, then report back. Axon AI asks when something is unclear, stops for approval before destructive work, and keeps its actions and outcomes visible. Writes are audit-logged.
Run the Checkout test on Chrome and Firefox and tell me when it is done.
Done. Chrome passed 11 of 11. Firefox passed 10 of 11, and one step self-healed after a button moved. Nothing looks broken from the dev changes. Want the report?
Try asking Axon:
Destructive actions need approval. Writes are audit-logged.
Security
Read our security documents. You do not have to ask.
The security overview, the subprocessor list with regions, the full data inventory and every retention window are published on this site. No portal, no NDA, no call first. We hold no SOC 2 report and no ISO 27001 certificate, and that is published too, next to the management system we do run.
- 26 Aug 2026
- Management system approved, and running
- 93
- Annex A controls in a published statement
- 0
- Gaps across the 33 SOC 2 Common Criteria
- None
- Certificates held. We say so on the page
Built from testing practice
The same release goes wrong at every size.
AxonQA comes from close to a decade in software testing, across teams that ranged from a handful of engineers to established QA functions. The pain points repeat at every size: the evidence lives in four tools, coverage is a guess, and the call on whether to ship gets made from instinct. That is why manual evidence counts here, why healing can never rewrite an assertion, and why accepted risk needs a named person and a reason. Axon AI handles the work around those decisions while human judgement stays in charge.
Integrations
Works with the tools you already use
Connect your tracker, alert your team, gate your CI on run verdicts, and drive AxonQA from external AI agents. Your test code never leaves AxonQA.
We are adding new integrations regularly. Need one you do not see here? Tell us and we will factor it into the roadmap.
Not ready to point it at your own app?
Every new paid workspace opens on a worked sample storefront: real epics and stories, generated test cases, and a history of runs with passes, failures, and heals. Click through the whole workflow before you connect anything of your own.
Get the build notes
Occasional email on what we are shipping, what we are learning about AI in QA, and when the doors open wider. No noise, unsubscribe anytime.
Your email, nothing else. We never share it.
Know what you are shipping.
Choose Pro or Team, bring a project in, and see where it actually stands before the next release goes out.